Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Politics & Numbers 2 - Paul Craig Roberts on the loss of jobs in America

Normally I wouldn't post this kind of stuff. I prefer to read it in silence and feign interest in the current political situation in the west. The problem is that when the US falls, it will take us all down with it. And it doesn't look like the economy is heading for an upswing any time soon, either, considering the HUGE trade deficit and the amount of foreign borrowing that is required to keep the economy hobbling along in its current diseased state.

Especially in this case, what you don't know WILL hurt you.

I think I need another triple espresso after reading this one. You may too, but it will be worth it since it provides a better understanding regarding actual situation of the American economy, the GDP, and the loss & creation of jobs.

Enjoy. I did.

Oh, one last thing! I highly recommend following some if not all of these links in the two posts because you will get a MUCH better picture of how thin the ice really is beneath your feet.

Non-politically yours...

Cameron

P.S. You may also want to read Roberts' thoughts on Obama and Global Trade where he explains how "the U.S. government is essentially bankrupt", how official statistics (he doesn't list them, but you can look them up if you wish) show "no growth in median family income in many years", and how Senator Obama's proposed plan for "a lower tax rate for US companies that maintain or increase their US workforce relative to their overseas workforce [Obama seeks Ohio’s blue-collar vote, By Edward Luce, February 19 2008]... shows more serious thought than can be found among Washington policymakers and the economics profession." 

******************************

No Jobs for the New Economy or the Old
By
Paul Craig Roberts
January 07, 2008  

http://www.vdare.com/roberts/080107_jobs.htm

December did not bring Americans any jobs. To the contrary, the private sector lost 13,000 jobs from the previous month.

If December is a harbinger of the New Year, it is going to be a bad one. The past year, hailed by Republican propagandists and "free trade" economists as proof of globalism’s benefit to Americans, was dismal. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ nonfarm payroll data, the US "super economy" created a miserable 1,054,000 net new jobs during 2007. [BLS Job Numbers, January 4, 2008]

This is not enough to keep up with population growth—even at the rate discouraged Americans, unable to find jobs, are dropping out of the work force—thus the rise in the unemployment rate to 5%.

During the past year, US goods producing industries, continuing a long trend, lost 374,000 jobs.

But making things was the "old economy." The "new economy" provides services. Last year 1,428,000 private sector service jobs were created.

Are the "free trade" propagandists correct that these service jobs, which are our future, are high-end jobs in research and development, innovation, venture capitalism, information technology, high finance, and science and engineering where the US allegedly has such a shortage of scientists and engineers that it must import them from abroad on work visas?

Not according to the official job statistics.

What occupations provided the 1.4 million service jobs in 2007?

Waitresses and bartenders accounted for 304,200, or 21% of the new service jobs last year and 29% of the net new jobs.

Health care and social assistance accounted for 478,400, or 33% of the new service jobs and 45% of the net new jobs. Ambulatory health care and hospitals accounted for the lion’s share of these jobs.

Professional and business services accounted for 314,000, or 22% of the new service jobs and 30% of the net new jobs. Are these professional and business service jobs the high-end jobs of which "free traders" speak? Decide for yourself. Services to buildings and dwellings account for 53,600 of the jobs. Accounting and bookkeeping services account for 60,500 of the jobs. Architectural and engineering services account for 54,700 of the jobs. Computer systems design and related services account for 70,400 of the jobs. Management consultants account for 88,400 of the jobs.

There were more jobs for hospital orderlies than for architects and engineers. Waitresses and bartenders accounted for as many of last year’s new jobs as the entirety of professional and business services.

Wholesale and retail trade, transportation, and utilities accounted for 181,000 of 2007’s new jobs.

Where are the rest of the new jobs? There are a few scattered among arts, entertainment, and recreation, repair and maintenance, personal and laundry services, and membership associations and organizations.

That’s it.

Keep in mind that the loss of 374,000 goods producing jobs must be subtracted from the 1,428,000 new service jobs to arrive at the net job gain figure. The new service jobs account for more than 100% of the net new jobs.

Keep in mind, too, that many of the new jobs are not filled by American citizens. Many of the engineering and science jobs were filled by foreigners brought in on work visas. Indians and others from abroad can be hired to work in the US for one-third less. The engineering and science jobs that are offshored are paid as little as one-fifth of the US salary. Even foreign nurses are brought in on work visas. No one knows how many of the hospital orderlies are illegals.

What a super new economy Americans have! US job growth has a distinctly third world flavor. A very small percentage of 2007’s new jobs required a college education. Since there are so few jobs for university graduates, how is "education the answer"?

Where is the benefit to Americans of offshoring? The answer is that the benefit is confined to a few highly paid executives who receive multi-million dollar bonuses for increasing profits by offshoring jobs. The rest of the big money went to Wall Street crooks who sold trusting people subprime derivatives.

"Free traders" will assert that the benefit is in low Wal-Mart prices. But the prices are low only because China keeps its currency pegged to the dollar. Thus, the Chinese currency value falls with the dollar. The peg will not continue forever. The dollar has lost 60% of its value against the Euro during the years of the Bush regime. Already China is having to adjust the peg. When the peg goes, Wal-Mart shoppers will think they are in Neiman Marcus.

Just as Americans have been betrayed by "their" leaders in government at all levels, they have been betrayed by business "leaders" on Wall Street and in the corporations. US government and business elites have proven themselves to be Americans’ worst enemies.

18 comments:

  1. Cameron, I am a financial journalist and have - sadly - seen this whole pile of poo build up over the years ... and have stood there, no seldom utterly stunned, by the lack of insight, understanding, let alone FOREsight of the players turning the big and small wheel in the business community. This latest subprime shambles is the most blatant example of our parasitical and scavenging the world of business and finance has become ... For 10,000 years or longer, us humans have live by a very simple economic success principle: growth. And because that strategy from the Neanderthal era doesn´t quite work any longer, each economic cycle leaves us with more problems than the one before ... But neither our political nor our business leaders have an alternative vision for the future. I need that triple espresso, too ... LOL

    ReplyDelete
  2. Silvia, please visit my Camosophy: SHIFT - the paradigm and help Tony to understand that his perception of the economy is not accurate, but that it isn't his fault. Most people believe the statistics that the government and the newspapers print for us, just like they believe that carbohydrates are good for us and fats are bad. In spite of overwhelming evidence in the real world to the contrary, the information we are being fed continues to fly in the face of reality. And unfortunately most of us continue to believe it.

    I really appreciate you popping in here. Thank you!

    P.S. Now is the perfect time to STOP standing there dumbfounded, frozen in your tracks at the shock you have faced, and get in action. You, doing what you do, most likely have far more correct information than most of us will ever get from our standard (and biased) news sources. PLEASE start writing about it; become another Paul Craig Roberts and Paul Krugman for Multiply!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I always recommend to everybody another read of the old fair tale: The Emperor´s New Clothes.

    Because that´s the kind of global economy (and financial world) we have been living in for a long time. We all pretend the Emperor is wearing a fantastic gown, while in truth he is stalk naked.

    I´ll look up that page of yours, Cameron ... eh, tomorrow ... 2 am in the Fatherland now. Better get some sleep. xxx

    PS: I AM writing about it ...

    MSNBC - Eurocentric - Silvia Wadhwa Front Page

    ReplyDelete
  4. Walmart killed small business in PR
    when things go bad in the USA the hardest hit are the poor countries who depend on the US booming economy to survive
    Puerto Rico is one of the top countries on that list

    ReplyDelete
  5. Carrie - Well, the automobile industry sure seems to be booming in PR. If not the new car business, then the repair business. I have never seen so many cars in such a small place in my entire life! (I haven't been to Thailand yet, but there, it is swarming with bicycles).

    That was... ummm... when I wasn't passed out in Inesta's automobile as she was trying to get out of OSJ...

    I love you!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bicycles? I want a bicycle! But I want one that light and easy to ride. How bout some pointers on what kind of bicycle to buy Cammy.

    ReplyDelete
  7. In a nutshell, Mavis, I highly recommend the hybrid or "cross" bikes. These are a hybrid bike that has mountain bike ruggedness (in case you find yourself not riding on pavement), but without the mountainbike geometry which can give people sore backs if they are riding for long distances on flat terrain.

    Tires are larger and thinner than mountain bike tires meaning that you have less rolling resistance and pedaling is with less effort (less loss of energy). But they are still knobby, giving you off-road security as well.

    The frame angles are very comfortable and a bit more upright. The stress is taken off the back and off the wrists. They usually come with suspended seat pillars and a softer seat to give you more "butt comfort" which we all need. Seats are easy to change later on to find something that suits you even better for the distances you travel.

    The cross bike is excellent for commuting because you can put fenders and mud guards as well as baskets for shopping or carrying things. The gearing is excellent for flat riding, or rolling hills, and even the odd "weekend warrior" attack on off-road dirt trails or lovely, relaxing in-the-woods gravel roads. And I know you have lots of THOSE around!

    So I'll leave it at that because I don't want to recommend any brand. The only thing I will say, is NEVER buy a bicycle from a hardware store. You will get a cheap, Chinese "slag puppy" as we call them. Go to a recognized bike shop and tell them what kind of riding you want to do, how much you plan to ride, and what kind of budget you are thinking about. If you have a sore back, be sure to let them know as well as they will choose a bike that best fits your needs. Trust your bike shop with your butt!

    Take it from a guy who owns three mountain bikes and one folding bike....

    ReplyDelete
  8. when are you coming back to fix your nephews bikes??????????????????????

    ReplyDelete
  9. Didn't I spend the entire Macro-economics section of our MBA program arguing this with Professor Lupine? I guess a former Reagan Undersecretary of the Treasury is as much of a discredited socialist as I am.
    Fuck I hate being right about everything all the time.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Rob - Your head did seem rather ... larger the last time I saw you on camera. What's your hat size now?

    And of course I mean that in a TOTALLY platonic way...

    ReplyDelete
  11. Sorry man, I really, really do want to be wrong about everything...
    -I want the Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction to be secure, and Iraq to be a flourishing, cosmopolitan, liberal democracy just like the neo-cons promised.
    -I want the Afghani warlords to come together in a spirit of nation building.
    -I want George Bush to actually be compassionate and/or conservative.
    -I want free trade agreements to hoist us up to capitalist nirvana by our monetary pigtails.
    -I want tech stocks to be worth their ridiculous valuations, and the same for sub-prime tract homes.

    What I'm saying is not that I'm the smartest guy in the world; hell I'm just another asshole stuck out in the backwoods of Japan. Yet I can smell a lie like a fart in a compact car. So if I could out that all this stuff was untrue (to be generous) how come Hillary couldn't?

    ReplyDelete
  12. It's really sad how Americans can be bamboozled by the Bush administration and its willing cohorts in the press into thinking because we aren't (YET) it the throes of another great depression that we are doing well.

    they buy more and more on credit and pay the monthly minimums, then think they are doing damn well.

    And why not.. their president told them to go out and buy buy buy.
    And they're having the bill come due soon if not now.
    The shit will hit the fan sooner or later. It already has for the fools who were sold on the idea they could afford huge houses and their concomitant mortgages. Now with bankruptcy looming over their heads, Bush is trying to buy votes with a few bailouts to these unfortunates.

    Our economy is so shaky and the cons who tell you otherwise are either fooling themselves or trying to fool all of us.
    Either way, they're idiots.

    Was that too harsh?
    Don't want to start another brouhaha on your blog again, Cammy.

    But i think we're safe.

    When hit with real numbers they run... or deny it as "liberal" propaganda.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Go ahead and start the brouhaha's Jen. Your statements are always on target as far as I am concerned. And isn't it about time we "liberals" speak up? We have been silent too long. We many not change anyone's mind and we may not reach the idiots, they have blinders on. But when one "liberal" makes sense, it gives another "liberal" the support they need to also speak and then another, and another and another, and before you know it you have over a million people who finally have the voice they have been looking for.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Keep up the fantastic discourse, you two wonderfully ... wonderful women! I love you!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hi Jen,
    Isn't it funny how reality has such a strong liberal bias?

    ReplyDelete